This is the second installment of things that I have learned from being asked to resign at a church. To read the background of this post, click here. To read the first lesson I learned, click here.
Before I share my thoughts in this area, I just want to point out that this is my perspective. I am mostly wrestling with the things that I can change about myself, but along the way, I am periodically making a plea to my elders (if they read this), as well as elders in general to consider ahead of time or rethink how they respond to concerns about their minister. I realize that there are always two sides to a story. I'm simply sharing my perspective. If you don't see it the way I see it, I welcome some interaction.
As I think about mistakes I made, one of the biggest was that I didn't identify those things that my fellow leaders, especially my elders, believed were most important. We all have doctrines (teachings) that we hold to be important. The question is, "How important are they?" In the following, I borrow a structure I found after the loss of my job. (1) I wish I had found this structure earlier. Perhaps it will help you.
In order to help us understand how important doctrines are to different people, I want us to imagine that doctrines or teachings fall into three different categories. First order doctrines are those things that in our minds have to be true for Christianity to be true. To deny someone's first order doctrine is to deny the very fabric of Christianity for them. For example: God created all things is probably a first order doctrine that most Christians could agree on.
Second order doctrines are those things which may result in there being different camps or different tribes in Christianity. Doctrines on the meaning and the mode of baptism, a certain doctrinal system (Calvinism or Arminianism), church organizational structure (should the church be led by lay elders or hired pastors?), liturgical forms (worship structures), whether women can have vocal roles or not, etc. While most Christians believe in the first order doctrines, they often disagree so heatedly over some of these second order doctrines that they cannot remain in fellowship, even though they are unified in the most important things.
And finally, there are third order doctrines. These are things that two people could disagree over yet still share a pew on Sunday. These are simply the varied beliefs that are found in every church. (2)
Not surprisingly, it is not always clear where what you believe sits in somebody else's doctrinal order. Sometimes something that you believe might cause someone else to question your salvation even though you both believe many of the same first-order doctrines. For example I have some Christian friends who believe in evolution. Other Christians see belief in evolution as a denial of the existence of God.
Other times, doctrines where you are comfortable "agreeing to disagree" (third order for you) land in another person's second order doctrines and cause them to want to withdraw fellowship from you.
Other times, doctrines where you are comfortable "agreeing to disagree" (third order for you) land in another person's second order doctrines and cause them to want to withdraw fellowship from you.
So my mistake was that I naively thought that with the right arguments and Scriptural backing I could persuade people to shift some of their doctrines. I tried to convince them that some of their second order doctrines (teachings they believed that would cause them to withdraw fellowship) were either wrong or at the very least that they were third order doctrines (doctrines where we can agree to disagree). I even preached a sermon aimed at a second order doctrine that many people in the church held. You can probably imagine that neither of these endeavors went well. I want to make a plea to ministers to carefully research where the church you serve and her leadership stands before you try to be the maverick who sets everybody straight with your "brilliant arguments" and your "superior theology". Yes, I am being sarcastic but I am also being real. Many times, we ministers get a bit of a superiority complex because of our education and continued reading and studying. Be careful with that.
On the other side of the coin to the elders I will say that ministers are not always going to believe, preach or teach things you are comfortable with. Their perspectives are much different than yours if for no other reason than you are different people. When you add the fact that you are possibly from different generations, that the minister probably has some kind of theological training that you don't have, and that the minister is probably coming from somewhere outside the established church system (3), the differences sky-rocket. I want to encourage all parties, both elders and ministers, to do what Jesus encouraged his disciples to do in John 13: 34-35. Love one another as he loved us. His love didn't include simply dying for us, his love included gaining our perspective and becoming human like us (Philippians 2:7). He was also tempted in the same ways we are tempted (Hebrews 4:15). He loved us enough to gain our perspective. And I believe we should all love each other enough to understand our fellow Christian's point of view as well as we understand our own. We love by asking questions and comprehending not by making statements and trying to convince.
If I could do it all over again, I would do it this way and try to love like Jesus loved me.
If I could do it all over again, I would do it this way and try to love like Jesus loved me.
Stay tuned for more installments.
Blessings,
Josh
1. From Matthew Dowling's chapter in the book called Why We Stayed: Honesty and Hope in the Churches of Christ, edited by Benjamin J. Williams
2. It is actually my belief that many second order doctrines should be third order doctrines. If you only have a verse or two to support a doctrine that causes you to withdraw from other people with the same first-order doctrines as you, maybe you should take a deeper look at what you believe and perhaps you should even talk to some people who see things differently than you. You might learn something.
3. A church system is formed over many years. People who have grown up in the system adopt a certain way of viewing church and doing church that isn't written down, it's just known. Many times an eldership has many unwritten rules about what you can change and what you can't. When a minister who is not part of the system comes in and pushes on those unwritten rules and ways of doing things, you can imagine that it causes friction. This is why I believe it is wise for a new minister to not tackle anything too big at the outset of his ministry tenure. You have to learn the taboo areas and the unwritten rules.
1. From Matthew Dowling's chapter in the book called Why We Stayed: Honesty and Hope in the Churches of Christ, edited by Benjamin J. Williams
2. It is actually my belief that many second order doctrines should be third order doctrines. If you only have a verse or two to support a doctrine that causes you to withdraw from other people with the same first-order doctrines as you, maybe you should take a deeper look at what you believe and perhaps you should even talk to some people who see things differently than you. You might learn something.
3. A church system is formed over many years. People who have grown up in the system adopt a certain way of viewing church and doing church that isn't written down, it's just known. Many times an eldership has many unwritten rules about what you can change and what you can't. When a minister who is not part of the system comes in and pushes on those unwritten rules and ways of doing things, you can imagine that it causes friction. This is why I believe it is wise for a new minister to not tackle anything too big at the outset of his ministry tenure. You have to learn the taboo areas and the unwritten rules.